Baby When I Get Home I Want to Belive in Jesus

março 11, 2022 Postar um comentário

The evidence is overwhelming. Jesus Christ Really Existed.

Did Jesus Really Exist? Where is the proof from non-Bible sources that he is real?

These questions and others like it are often asked by Bible skeptics and atheists alike. This article will show that not only is there historical evidence (from secular sources as well as Christian) that Jesus Christ was real and existed, merely also that Jesus Christ is the virtually documented and historically verifiable figure in antiquity.
Historical Show of Jesus Christ'south Existence From Sources Outside the Bible

Non Biblical sources

Jospehus did not believe Jesus was the Son of God. But he wrote about him.

There are many secular historians who lived in the century after the death of Jesus Christ who confirmed his existence. Here are some of them:

Flavius Josephus

According to his Wikipedia entry: "Titus Flavius Josephus (37 – c. 100), was a 1st-century Romano-Jewish historian and hagiographer of priestly and royal ancestry who recorded Jewish history, with special emphasis on the 1st century Ad and the Beginning Jewish–Roman State of war, which resulted in the Devastation of Jerusalem and its temple in 70."

His well-nigh important works were The Jewish War (c. 75) and Antiquities of the Jews (c. 94). The Jewish War recounts the Jewish revolt against Roman occupation (66–70). Antiquities of the Jews recounts the history of the world from a Jewish perspective for an ostensibly Roman audience. These works provide valuable insight into 1st century Judaism and the background of Early Christianity.

Josephus was a Jew who did not believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God or Christianity. In The Antiquities of the Jews, volume 18, chapter 3, paragraph 3 the famous historian Flavius Josephus writes:

"Now, at that place was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a human being, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross , those that loved him at the kickoff did not abdicate him, for he appeared to them alive once more the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, then named from him, are not extinct at this day." (source)

Later Josephus writes:

"But the younger Ananus who, as nosotros said, received the high priesthood, was of a bold disposition and exceptionally daring; he followed the political party of the Sadducees, who are astringent in judgment above all the Jews, equally we have already shown. Every bit therefore Ananus was of such a disposition, he thought he had now a good opportunity, as Festus was now dead, and Albinus was still on the road; and then he assembled a council of judges, and brought earlier information technology the brother of Jesus the and so-called Christ, whose name was James, together with some others, and having defendant them as law-breakers, he delivered them over to be stoned." (source)

Josephus considered one of the greatest historians of antiquity, independently provides proof and evidence that Jesus was a real person who did be and also confirms the crucifixion of Jesus on the cross under the orders of Pontius Pilate, thus confirming the Biblical account as well.

Tacitus

Cornelius Tacitus was a Roman Historian who lived from 55-120AD. In 115 AD, P. Cornelius Tacitus wrote the post-obit passage that refers to Jesus (called "Christus," which means "The Messiah") in book xv, affiliate 44 of The Annals later on a six-day fire burned much of Rome:

"Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, chosen Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the proper noun had its origin, suffered the extreme penalization during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a near mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out non only in Judaea, the starting time source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every role of the world detect their eye and go popular. Accordingly, an arrest was commencement made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was bedevilled, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred confronting mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn past dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve every bit a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired." (source)

Despite the fact the clearly despised Christianity as a "mischievous superstition", Tacitus no less confirms in one case once more the beingness of Jesus and His crucifixion on the cross, information technology also states Pontius Pilate as the procurator who oversaw the crucifixion again giving not-Biblical proof of Jesus' being as recorded in the Bible.

Pliny The Younger

Pliny The Younger wrote of his persecution of Christians.

Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus, (61 AD – ca. 112 Advertizing) : "better known as Pliny the Younger, was a lawyer, author, and magistrate of Ancient Rome. According to Wikipedia: "Pliny is known for his hundreds of surviving letters, which are an invaluable historical source for the time period. Many are addressed to reigning emperors or to notables such as the historian, Tacitus. Pliny himself was a notable figure, serving equally an imperial magistrate under Trajan (reigned AD 98–117). Pliny was considered an honest and moderate man, consistent in his pursuit of suspected Christian members co-ordinate to Roman law, and rose through a series of Imperial civil and military machine offices, the cursus honorum."

In his correspondence with the emperor Trajan (Epistulae X.96) he reported on his actions against the followers of Christ. He asks the Emperor for instructions dealing with Christians and explained that he forced Christians to curse Christ under painful torturous inquisition:

"They were accustomed to see on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and bound themselves to a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, merely never to commit any fraud, theft, adultery, never to falsify their give-and-take, not to deny a trust when they should be called upon to evangelize it upwardly. When this was over, information technology was their custom to depart and to gather again to partake of a meal–but ordinary and innocent food." (source)

So not just was Pliny enlightened of Jesus Christ, he also provides description of the activities of the early church. In a later writing he details persecution against Christians:

"Fifty-fifty this do, however, they had abandoned after the publication of my edict, past which, according to your orders, I had forbidden political associations. I therefore judged it so much more than the necessary to excerpt the real truth, with the assistance of torture, from two female slaves, who were styled deaconesses: but I could discover cypher more than depraved and excessive superstition.

In the meanwhile, the method I have observed towards those who take denounced to me as Christians is this: I interrogated them whether they were Christians; if they confessed information technology I repeated the question twice again, adding the threat of death sentence; if they all the same persevered, I ordered them to be executed. For whatever the nature of their creed might be, I could at least feel not doubt that contumacy and inflexible obstinacy deserved chastisement. There were others possessed of the aforementioned folly; only because they were Roman citizens, I signed an gild for them to be transferred to Rome." (source)

And so here we see that not only did Pliny not follow the Christian faith, he was torturing Christians and threatening death confronting them. And he even records that under threat of execution (but for believing in Jesus Christ equally God) the early on church members refused to deny their organized religion in Jesus. This is remarkable show of Jesus' existence outside of the Bible.

Julius Africanus and Tallus

Sextus Julius Africanus (c.160 – c.240) was a Christian traveller and historian of the belatedly 2nd and early on 3rd century Advertizement. He is important importantly because of his influence on Eusebius, on all the after writers of Church history among the Fathers, and on the whole Greek school of chroniclers
Julius Africanus quotes the writings of Tallus, who was a outset century non-Christian historian. In his Chronicles, Africanus quoting the historian Tallus, explains the reason for it being so dark during the day fourth dimension on the day of crucifixion of Jesus Christ:

"An eclipse of the sun'unreasonably, as information technology seems to me (unreasonably of course, considering a solar eclipse could not have identify at the time of the full moon, and it was at the season of the Paschal full moon that Christ died." Julius Africanus, Chronography, xviii.

The importance of this quote is 2 fold every bit it shows: i) non-Christian proof of Jesus' existence and 2) all the same some other confirmation of the Bible's account of Jesus' crucifixion. The Bible states in reference to the time Jesus was put on the cantankerous: "Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour" The "6th hour" is apex and the ninth hour is 3:00PM. Thus nosotros encounter that the historian Thallus was trying to explain the odd occurrence of the sky existence night at noon during the crucifxion of Jesus as an eclipse. Africanus also quotes the secular scholar Phlegon, a Greek Historian who lived in the 2d century AD and also wrote of an eclipse occuring on the day Jesus was crucified. This once more provides proof from a non-Christian source that confirms the business relationship of Jesus beingness a real person who lived too as confirming the business relationship of His crucifixion straight from the Bible.

Lucian of Samosate

Lucian (Born 115 AD) was a well-known Greek satirist and traveling lecturer. More than eighty works carry his name. He mocked Christians in his writing, simply at the same fourth dimension provided show that Jesus really did exist:

"He was second only to that 1 whom they nevertheless worship today, the homo in Palestine who was crucified because he brought this new form of initiation into the world."

"Having convinced themselves that they are immortal and will live forever, the poor wretches despise decease and virtually willingly give themselves to information technology. Moreover, that outset lawgiver of theirs persuaded them that they are all brothers the moment they transgress and deny the Greek gods and brainstorm worshiping that crucified sophist and living by his laws."

"They scorn all possessions without distinction and care for them as customs property. They have such things on faith alone, without any bear witness. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to have advantage of a state of affairs comes amidst them, he can brand himself rich in a short fourth dimension."

So once again, even though Lucian does non mention Jesus by name, at that place is no doubt he is speaking of the Jesus equally he confirms: i) that he was crucified in "Palestine" (the name of Israel at that time), ii) had followers who believed in eternal life and 3) that they were all equal in Jesus Christ. Lucian even mentions that Christians deny all other gods and believe on "organized religion lonely." This again is all in accordance with the Bible'southward clear statements about the Christian faith and provides even more prove from outside of the Bible that Jesus, the "human in Palestine" did really exist.

Seutonius

Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus commonly known as Suetonius (ca. 69/75 – after 130), was a Roman historian belonging to the equestrian order in the early Regal era. His nearly important surviving work is a set of biographies of twelve successive Roman rulers, from Julius Caesar to Domitian, entitled De Vita Caesarum. The clarification of his writings states:

The emperor Claudius reigned 41 to 54 Advertising. Suetonius reports his dealings with the eastern Roman Empire, that is, with Greece and Macedonia, and with the Lycians, Rhodians, and Trojans. He then reports that the emperor expelled the Jews from Rome, since they "constantly made disturbances at the instigation of Christ" (Judaeos impulsore Chresto assidue tumultuantis Roma expulit). The proper noun appears in manuscripts of Suetonius as Chrestus, a class also used by the Roman historian Tacitus to refer to Chrestiani. (source)

Skeptics will point to the different spelling to say "that's not Jesus he's talking well-nigh!" merely again, with the totality of bear witness, it's very obvious that followers of Jesus in the Roman Empire were persecuted by Roman authorities. And then it certainly falls in line with the other historical accounts. And at that place are a number of sources the support the history of Christians in the Roman empire who followed Jesus Christ and being punished for it.

The Bible is Historical Proof That Jesus Existed

The amount of New Testament manuscript show of Jesus Christ is greater than any other figure in antiquity.

At that place is a great logical fallacy among Bible skeptics, atheists and those who like to challenge Christianity that says when discussing the historical aspects of the Bible "y'all can't use the Bible equally proof that Jesus existed. You must use non-Bible sources!!" To which this author says, "why not?" The four Gospels of the Bible are bibliographical accounts of the life of Jesus. The normal objective measure of the reliability of historical documents is: 1) The number of bachelor copies of ancient manuscripts and 2) the fourth dimension span betwixt the original version and the engagement of those copies still in existence today. When examined under this standard, the Bible proves to provide a treasure trove of proof and evidence that Jesus actually existed.

Some of the earliest manuscript fragments of the New Testament are the John Rylands Fragment, Chester Beatty Papyrus and the Bodmer Papyrus which were written between fifty-100AD. Copies of these papyri were reproduced in 125-200AD, significant that the fourth dimension span betwixt the originals and the copies still in existence today is 29 years to 130 years, putting all these manuscripts beings written anywhere from 50-100 years after the decease of Jesus Christ. Now some may object and say "Hold on! These manuscripts were written years later on Jesus died. There's no way they could be reliable!" But any good on ancient documents would disagree.

Let's look at some of the more than famous and universally accepted historical documents and see how they match up with the Bible:

Plato — Plato wrote his works from 427-347 BC. The earliest manuscript copy of Plato'southward writing in being today was written in 900 AD. That is 1,200 years after Plato's death! And there are only 2 copies of these manuscripts in existence. (source)

Julius Caesar — One of the most historic and trusted historical figures. Caesar lived from 100-44 BC and the primeval manuscript copy of his writings dates back to 900 AD, putting our best bear witness of Caesar always existing 1,000 years later his expiry. And there are 10 copies of aboriginal manuscripts of Caesar's Gallic Wars. (source) So if you question the Bible based on when it was written, being "translated so many times" (information technology was not – we still have the same Greek manuscripts today) and all the same question whether Jesus existed, then you must also be really sure that Julius Caesar and Plato were completely fictional characters and never actually existed.

Homer — Homer, who historians are not even sure ever really existed fifty-fifty today, is credited with writing the Iliad in ca 900 BC. The earliest manuscript re-create of the Iliad dates to 400 BC. Pregnant the only proof of Homer or the Iliad being authentic is from 500 years after the expiry of Homer. Additionally there are 643 copies of aboriginal manuscripts of the Iliad written over the centuries that when compared against each other past experts have a 95.3 consistency and accurateness, making it one of the most reliable and proven documents of antiquity. (source)

That is of course, until y'all compare information technology to the New Testament. The New Attestation manuscripts date to less than 100 years later on the death of Christ. Additionally there are over 5,600 aboriginal manuscript copies of the New Testament giving information technology more than copies to a degree that dwarfs any other figure of aboriginal history (to view actual copies of some of these aboriginal manuscripts, see here). And they have a 99% accurateness when compared to each other. The evidence is not even comparable. And it all points to Jesus Christ. The record of the life, ministry, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ has more prove and proof than whatever other person from antiquity.

The Proof and Evidence is Clear – Jesus Christ Really Existed

The most astonishing conclusion in all of this is not that Jesus really existed — information technology is that He still exists. And He sits in Heaven at the right hand of God offering forgiveness to those who will non just believe He was a regular man, but that He equally the Son of God, gave His life on that same cross that then many historians knew about, to accept the punishment for sins that all of humanity has committed. It just takes faith and trust in that cede to receive him. Jesus said: Behold, I stand up at the door, and knock: if any human being hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and volition sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit down with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am fix down with my Father in his throne. – Revelation 3:xx-21.

Jesus wants us to believe in Him so we can be freely forgiven of the sins we accept committed in our lives, take eternal life and reign with Him. So at present that it is established that He existed, why not take the fourth dimension to become to know Jesus Christ and who He said He is from His historically-verifiable perspective? Your eternal life may depend on it.

cabreracontable.blogspot.com

Source: https://beginningandend.com/jesus-exist-historical-evidence-jesus-christ/